Friday, May 18, 2007
Media Literacy Recap
For the unit, Megan and I created a WebQuest (which is still underproduction). Students would complete analysis tasks for homework that would correspond to the following class day's lesson. The analysis tasks would ask students to view a certain pre-selected aspects of media, then respond to questions in a blog. Their analysis would then help them in lesson projects, as well as the unit's culminating project.
For each class, depending on the media we were focusing on that day, students would work with a technology program to develop a small project (either individually or with a group), using that media and showing how it corresponds/relates/influences their lives. For example, for the lesson on Reality TV, students would be working with iMovie. After reviewing a YouTube clip from homework and discussing it as a class, students would get into groups of three, search for Reality TV related pictures or video clips, and create their own iMovie film. The photos and clips will have to show/explain how they see how relationships in their lives. Groups would then briefly explain why they chose the images they did, and how they think Reality TV may or may not influence their view of relationships based on sex and sexuality.
The mini-projects during the lessons will help students int he unit's culminating project, in which students must use several aspects of media to define, show an understanding, and analyze relationships in their lives as constructed through sex and sexuality. Students will also choose a way to present their projects; the mini-projects during lessons will have allowed students to practice using different programs. After completing the projects, students will present the projects, explaining why they did what they did and integrating important vocabulary learned and used throughout the unit.
Megan and I also created a short iMovie to show with our Media Literacy Project, which is actually out Project Block 4 creation. The movie compared relationships in the media and relationships in "reality."
Monday, May 7, 2007
Just Some Late Night Thoughts...
A group of us in the AEN program received our student placements for the Fall. I'll be student teaching in Syracuse, which was not a surprise for me since I requested that general vicinity. But realizing that I will be teaching in the inner city at Henninger HS is overwhelming; it doesn't frighten me, but rather makes me apprehensive: I have heard horror stories of Syracuse schools, and I have to remind myself that I need to create my own opinion of them after I participate in the learning environment. But, if these students truly do not want to learn, unlike those in Camden, how do I teach? What do I do? How can I perk their interests? Sometimes there is just more to consider than we can ever know, and we have to have answers to questions that don't even exist yet (someone else said that, I don't remember who. I'm sorry I cannot cite it properly).
Regardless, reality is here. The girls I have spent the past two semesters with will be doing their own thing next semester; no more classes together. The community we built together is changing. Sure, we can keep in contact through emails, blogs, the Colloquium, the phone... but something is different now. The "letting go" is sad, nerve-racking, and exciting. And I know that I will always have, at least, eight other people I can contact and confide in.
Tonight we, those of us going into our Student Teaching, had dinner with a few of our professors: more community. That's what we have been building all along at Cortland. We have the classroom, the study groups, and now, thanks to media literacy and our educators' persistence to integrating blogs, the internet, and the Web in our learning.
Dr. Stearns asked me earlier tonight, at dinner, if I felt I have learned anything in 307. Of course I have. You can't be thrown into material you don't understand and be expected to explain it to others without learning about it yourself. But, besides the programs, I have learned more about myself in 307. Last week we participated in an impromptu "interview" scenario. Everything we had worked on in 307 was put to test-- we just had to choose one aspect and run with it. It was through this that I realized that I have something more to offer, and that I can create lessons not solely focused around a text. I also learned that I have so much else to learn: from my professors, my fellow classmates, and my own students.
In all, part of me wishes this semester wouldn't come to an end, because I know that that's what it could bring to so many areas of my life. On the other hand, it's time to move on, and everything I have learned, studied, produced, and applied from the beginning will now exercised in a school environment-- it's what we, as English Adolescence Education Majors, strive for. Might as well make the best of it and take away from it as much as you can, right?
Wednesday, May 2, 2007
20 minutes... What a Rush
The Unit will be called "Teenagers: Fact and Fiction." www.freewebs.com/jbrown14580
So far I have created a main page, which briefly explains the unit, the culminating activity, the blog assignments, the resources, and the media. I also began creating the first media page (television shows).
Monday, April 30, 2007
The Media Literacy Award
Media Literacy and Hobbs
1. Multiple Forms of Literacy
In this section, Hobb's states that "literacy must be reconceptualized to include these new message forms and to exploit their potential to help students master the demands of reading more sophisticated texts" (131). "These" refers to "visual, electronic, and digital forms of expression and communication" in such literacies such as visual, critical, informational, and digital (131). To continue, Hobbs explains that students use technologies to "create their own messages" (132). This is where it made sense. Students creating their own messages... If students are actively involved in something they like, involving technology they know, they will be more motivated in the work they do.
2. Learning that Connects Literacy to Life
Since media literacy can connect what students learn to what students live, it can increase student motivation and learning. This coincides with what was said above: creating own messages, life relevance, content that connects to students lives. Hobbs confirms that critical think skills, reading comprehension, and writing skills are all impacted (positively) by media literacies.
3. Students' reflection on their Literacy Learning
This is something that we-- students and teachers-in-training-- take part in consistently during the semester. Every course we take is likely to have us reflect on our work, and 3007 alone has us reflect on our work with Media Literacy and Literacy Learning. As students reflect on their work, they can understand what they have learned, how they have learned, the amount they have learned, and what else they can learn. They also begin to understand the material they have learned and why it was presented in such a way. For example: "what critical decisions were made about certain shows/songs/commercials/etc, and what impact does this have on my life?"
Wednesday, April 25, 2007
Second Life
Tuesday, April 24, 2007
Block III Media Literacy
"Pokinitis"
It's all about giving students the idea, courage, and belief that they CAN do it. Once you have them thinking about it, you just have to help them follow through by showing them it's possible.
Shape-Shifting Portfolio
The article does a wonderful job explaining Katie, Thomas, and Mario's shape-shifting portfolios; how the world around them, their cultures, lives, and literacies all contribute to the portfolios. But how would Mario showcase his culture's influence (and his influence on his culture) in his portfolio? I feel this is where I would help students when they were building their own shape-shifting portfolios. Students need to understand that when representing themselves, they need to show more than hard-copy works. granted, the hard-copy papers, projects, etc. are beneficial and should be shown, but that is not what makes a person who they are. Rather, it is everything in their world that contributes to what they are becoming. So Katie needs to know how to implement her Web use into her portfolio, even if she sees it as her "down-time" from her work; Thomas would include his literacy and literature influences; and Mario would stress his cultural influences.
In other words, the teacher is a guide for students to help students realize what they can put into their shape-shifting portfolios.
Monday, April 23, 2007
Mrs. Megan Bottle
So, in all, I'd have to declare Megan as my inspiration for this semester during 307.
Wednesday, April 18, 2007
EDUTOPIA
1. "Amount You Spend Out of Pocket Each Year on Classroom Supplies"
I was very curious in this section because I am more than willing to spend my own money to benefit my students' and classroom needs. At the same time, I'm worried how much I will have to provide because my budget can't. While this site didn't provide a lot of answers, it let me in on a little secret that I didn't know before. Check it out.
2. "Best YouTube Video about Education"
I was glad with this short article. It sums up that you can use sites, such as YouTube, for educational purposes without having to focus on the junk that may be on there as well. In other words: why boycott something useful and educational to students, which they can relate to and enjoy, just because there might somewhere be something not useful on it.
3. "Best Technology Product for Less than $100"
I enjoyed this article for one reason: the flash drive. During my Observation at Newfield High School, I noticed students saving their papers onto CD's so they could bring them into class and work on them. Unfortunately, that wastes a lot of space on the CD AND sometimes the information doesn't save properly or at all. One student in particular couldn't pull up her paper on the school's computer. When I went to help her I realized that she hadn't saved the information to the CD. Now her four page paper, which they were finishing in class and which was due at the end of the day, was sitting at home on her computer. I pulled out my flash drive, showed it to her, and told her she should get one. She mentioned to me that her father had a lot of them lying around, but she didn't know how to use them. So I should her and told her to ask her father for one. This piece of technology is helpful for students to keep their work organized and available.
What I Learned from Jo in Class Today!!!!
Monday, April 16, 2007
The MySpace/Hook-Up Generation
When I saw the review and visited the page, it discouraged me... a lot. Mostly because random hookups are happening. They happen on our campus, between our friends and classmates; and so many of us have become accustomed to this that we don't think twice about it happening half the time. The MySpace Generation (which, are we a part of?... right now I will classify them as the students we will be teaching) are also taking part in late night parties, hookups, and all the dangers that accompany those.
The MySpace Generation... at first I thought it was odd that Strepp connected the two together. But then I realized the hookups happen online too; teenagers, requesting and accepting friends over MySpace daily, don't always know who they are talking to, though they think they do. They might go to the same school, live in the same town, whatever, and decide to meet and "hookup." I don't know. This is one case where technology isn't always good for being mainstream and needs regulations.
"Video-on-Demand" and the Technorati
Sunday, April 15, 2007
Block II and III Projects
Megan, Jami, and I are almost done with the iPhoto book. I don't think we realized at first what a hassle it was going to be to put it together due to the school's computers deleting everything at night. But now that we were able to use Dr. Stearns Mac, everything should be ready to go early next week. Monday, we will be going over the final touches with Dr. Stearns (ie: making sure pictures are in a "good" order, making sure captions are grammatically correct, free of spelling errors, etc., and anything else that needs "tweeking"). Hopefully the book will look good.
Block III
Megan and I are working on the Media Literacy Project this block. We've thrown around a lot of ideas-- brainstorming at it's finest-- but we think we are going to focus on violence on television. Still, this needs to be narrowed down. We'll be talking with Dr. Stearns sometime this week to talk about possible ideas we have or that she might have on narrowing this subject.
Wednesday, April 11, 2007
Tuesday, April 10, 2007
Bruce Coville
In all, the presentation was phenomenal. More undergrads should have attended; you really missed out.
Tuesday, April 3, 2007
Live Chat Transcript: Lagging Behind
In ED WEEKS live chat transcript of “Technology Counts 2007: A Digital Decade,” Susan Victor, a teacher at
ED WEEK
ED WEEK’s article, “A Digital Decade,” discusses the differences in technology between ten years ago and today, explaining “how the terrain has changed—and how it is likely to do so in the future.” The “terrain” has already come a long ways; going from “fewer than two-thirds of U.S. public schools had Internet access, and just 14 percent of those schools had connections on computers located in classrooms” to “around 95 percent” of schools being online, students are gaining more technological knowledge and access through their school day. But what happens when students’ school atmosphere doesn’t meet the home atmosphere several have in terms of technology? Another article in ED WEEK, “Outside Interests,” focuses on just this. Students have more and better access to digital technology in their homes and lives outsides of school than they do in the classroom. The reasons? Budgets and/or educators unsure of how to apply technology to lessons. This is where our class, ENG 307: Technology in the Classroom, comes in. As we—currently students and teachers in training—practice using and learn the functions of several technological applications, we begin to understand how to apply them in our classrooms and lesson plans for the future. “Outside Interests” discusses the use of iPods, video games, pod casts, and blogs within classrooms; we’re already doing this in ours. I couldn’t help read through this article and agree with the schools who are integrating technology, while at the same time questioning those who are having trouble due to unknowledgeable teachers in the area of technology incorporation. Granted, budgets can cause some problems when trying to incorporate technology into schools; but this is addressed “A Digital Age” with the “education rate” (“E-rate”) program, created by the federal government. By offering “telecommunication discounts” and “provid[ing] more aid to disadvantaged school,” the federal government was able to “furnish billions of dollars to help get schools […] up to speed.” If we are spending the money on the actual technology, let’s also spend money on programs for educators that offer knowledge in how to incorporate this technology. That way, students won’t be left at school with inadequate access, limited equipment, or an ancient version of the technology they use at home.
Sunday, April 1, 2007
Tuesday, March 27, 2007
Differences in the Middle: Friedman and Kajder
“Girls, finish your homework—people in
As I was reading Friedman, I honestly felt the middle class was disappearing completely. Luckily (I think) it is merely changing (or so he says). So we change with it. After all, as future teachers we are subject to change; we can’t be expected to stick with one curriculum or lesson plan our entire educational career. Let’s integrate Web 3.0 into the mix. But how? This is where I get stuck. I like to pretend I’m technology savvy. I’m not. Technology spites me. The motherboard on my laptop fried a couple weeks ago and is currently being replaced (thank goodness for warranties). So, if I’m not technology savvy, how can I prepare my students to enter a world where they are competing with people in other nations for jobs, that frankly, the United States (in my opinion) seems to be falling behind in preparing us for? As you can see I have more questions than answers currently, and hopefully I will answer a few… no guarantees.
I’ve created a lot of questions in my mind; the primary ones being “How do we incorporate Web 3.0 into our classrooms” and “How can I prepare my students to enter a world where they are competing with people in other nations for jobs, when I have very limited knowledge of how Web 3.0—and technology— work?” To start, Friedman proposes the idea of “untouchables,” explaining how these “are people whose jobs cannot be outsourced, digitalized, or automated” (278). In other words: become an untouchable no matter what you have to do! Friedman continues to say there are “three broad categories” of untouchables: the “special of specialized,” the “’localized, and ‘anchored,’” and the “old middle” (280). I feel, right now, that as educators we fall into the “old middle” untouchables: we could, theoretically, be replaced; our jobs which were once “nonfungible,” will be taught to students on the Web by the time Web 7.0 rolls around. Regardless, we have to realize that we are currently molding our students into one of these three categories of untouchables (nonfungible jobs) or in a newer category focused around Web 3.0 and a “new middle” class. It’s my opinion that most of them will fall into the “localized/anchored” or the “old middle” category, finding jobs that have to be done in a certain area and require certain know-how, or finding jobs that can eventually move from being nonfungible to fungible. These students will attend the four-year colleges and find their comfort zones. Those that don’t fall into these categories, will surpass even us; they are the “special or specialized” or the “new middle.”
How do we get them on their way? Sara B. Kajder’s article, “Bringing the Outside In:
Kadjer’s article begins with a story of a reluctant student, Trapper, who can’t see, to write in class. Outside of class, Trapper was a powerful writer; he wrote for a cyberzine about Mountain Bikes. As teacher’s we have to bring out-of-class activities to class. This includes writing that students actively partake (and are interested in). Interest oriented. This leads back to Friedman and who we are molding our students into. Learners need to “tap into powerful communication tools to tell their story… powerfully” (Kajder x). In other words, let students do the things we, as educators, ask of them in a way they already know. If we provide them with several interests, especially ones they understand (the Web, iTunes, YouTube… anything that can come from Web 2.0), our students will have a better chance at finding a spot in the Web 3.0 world. This includes the job market.
Furthermore, by having students actively participate in the classrooms, we are creating mock-work situations that could benefit them later in life. Friendman refers to “The New Middlers” in Chapter 6 and what the “help wanted” sign of Web 3.0 looks like. The examples he gives are similar to activities, exercises, and participations classes already use; each “help wanted” sign could apply indirectly to classroom conduct and lessons. For example, the first “help wanted” sign—“Great Collaborators and Orchestrators”—is a great comparison for group work in classroom. Granted the group work we do in classes is less intense than the collaborating Friedman is discussing, but the concept is similar. Students work as a team, and generally one of two will stand out as “leaders” (or orchestrators) within the group. Sure, it is simplistic compared to the idea Friedman puts forth for Web 3.0, but for our students it’s a start.
In closing, Kajder’s article states “Too often we take to heart the saying ‘the medium is the message.’ We cannot let technology be the message. It is there to enhance the message and make it easier to deliver’” (Kajder x). How true. Technology, the medium, is not the message but rather the messenger. Still, while it may not be the message, technology (and Web 3.0) is just as important as the message it helps our students to deliver. Our students need to be able to express their messages with a comfortable messenger, which for most is the Web and technology, a medium they are already comfortable with. With this in mind, as educators we need to provide our students with the opportunity to do express themselves, use technology, and, eventually, enter into the Web 3.0 world.
Tuesday, March 20, 2007
D.A.T.E Conference
Attending the D.A.T.E Conference was quite the experience! I attended four sessions along with the Jennifer Donnelly presentation.
The first session I attended was Shade Gomez’s discussion, “Project Based Learning: Incorporating Technology into the Classroom.” This was phenomenal! Shade began with a short worksheet explaining how PowerPoint should be used in a classroom; it should be used as a backdrop/referral tool rather than the main focus of the lecture or discussion. He then went into different projects his own students had produced using technology. The students’ task was to create their own project; it was freeform. His students had such creativity! Students incorporated music—wrote songs, mixed music on computers, etc—created posters, fabric art, books, and even Lego-mation. The Lego-mation was intense and some students did incredibly well with it. They would take Legos, and use stop-motion animation so the Lego people acted out a scene from Hamlet. They had sets, characters, and voice-overs. I was amazed.
For the second session I attended (and introduced) was Elizabeth Netzband and Tamatha Picolla’s presentation on “Hope IS Here: Finding Positive Messages in YA Literature.” They introduced several great literature options to include in the classroom that give students a positive outlook on life. Still, I feel most stories will have that “upbeat” moral, and those that don’t have a learning experience in them that students can benefit from. While I might take some of their suggestions, I am not sure I agree with their stance completely.
The next event I attended was Jennifer Donnelly’s presentation on A Northern Light. I was impressed by her public speaking and speech writing abilities. Granted she has had practice with this, but Donnelly brought you into what she was saying and allowed the audience to connect with her words and material.
The third session I attended was Carol Mikoda and Jen Rimualdo’s discussion on the use of Nancy Atwell’s reading and writing workshop in the classroom: “No Workshop Left Behind: Reading and Writing at the Middle Level.” Since one of our classes is fairly centered around Atwell, and considering that several students in the class have questioned how it would/if could actually work in a school district, it was wonderful to hear that it is happening in a classroom in
The last session I attended was the informal discussion with Jennifer Donnelly, “Blood, Sweat and Fears: An Informal Discussion of the Writing Life with Jennifer Donnelly." I enjoyed hearing about her techniques, her ideas, and her processes throughout her writing. It was also fascinating to have her on the same level as the rest of us; instead of a famous writer lecturing us on what she does, she was a teacher/student just as we all are.
Sunday, March 4, 2007
A New Video starring David Pogue
(I wish The Times let me do more than give you the site...)
More on Social Networking
So, shortly after posting the last bit I found this. I found it interesting. I hadn't realized how crazy social networking was; I realized it was huge, but this is intense.
When Class Discussion and Reality Coincide
Sunday, February 25, 2007
Thursday, February 22, 2007
Oh Microsoft...
iPod, iPhoto, iTunes, iMovie, iLife, iWeb, and now.. iPhone!
How will we incorporate this in!? :)
Tuesday, February 20, 2007
Media Literacy, Hobbs, and ELA/NCTE Standards
· Media literacy is an expansion of traditional literacy that includes both analysis and production of all mediated forms of communication, from books to Web sites.
AND
· Media literacy helps teachers to more effectively address existing learning standards and engage students with varied learning styles
In Reading the Media, chapter 1,
· Media literacy can and should be integrated across the K-12 curricula at all grade levels and in multiple subject areas.
This seems like an obvious principle to me. Why wouldn’t media literacy be integrated through all levels of schooling? Granted some schools may have a more difficult time with certain stages of technology, but integrating media literacy goes beyond having a computer lab in the school.
Regarding
ELA/NCTE Learning Standards Emphasizing Media Literacy:
Students apply knowledge of language structure, language conventions (e.g., spelling and punctuation), media techniques, figurative language, and genre to create, critique, and discuss print and non-print texts.
Students use a variety of technological and information resources (e.g., libraries, databases, computer networks, video) to gather and synthesize information and to create and communicate knowledge.
Students participate as knowledgeable, reflective, creative, and critical members of a variety of literacy communities.
Students use spoken, written, and visual language to accomplish their own purposes (e.g., for learning, enjoyment, persuasion, and the exchange of information).
Thursday, February 8, 2007
There is SO Much Going On
And apparently I've become a New York Times fanatic because here is another article from the newspaper. This one discusses YouTube's success. It might be interesting to check out considering the Website has become such a popular part of today's culture and many of us have been including YouTube videos in our blogs.
Hope you enjoy those. Let me know what you think.
And now... to leave you with something intriguing to watch...
Wednesday, February 7, 2007
Tuesday, February 6, 2007
Warlick, Education, and the Web
Warlick introduces several Web sites (Backflip, PiNet Library) in Chapter 2 and a look into search engine use. Social bookmarking sites and search engines are useful tools for Web users, but rarely are they used effectively, especially the search engines. After starting a search off in a search engine, Warlick suggests using Web directories when finding information on a topic, then referring back to the search engine later on. Internet use is a process: SEARCH ("start Small, Edit search phrase, Advance to large search engine, Refine search phrase, Cycle back and advance again, Harvest the resources"). Students need help learning this process, adapting to it, and using it. By providing technology in the classroom and time to practice Web use for research, educator's can help their students become more proficient and comfortable exploring the Web.
And finally, I just wanted to say I loved this comment made by Warlick: "Once you have your blog, you can publish to your heart's content ad have your ideas, beliefs, and passions available to a global audience" (40). This is exactly what we are doing.
Monday, February 5, 2007
Better Than Google... and We Don't Have It.
Here's the Wiki for QQ, the messaging service connected to Tencent.
I just found that interesting. Here we are, using Google... everyone uses Google. Right? Well apparently China has found something better.
Saturday, February 3, 2007
I feel I should clarify what I was saying last class...
I will admit that it is less likely. I was researching some websites to find out how many students have computers in their homes and how many schools have access to computer use. Science and Engineering Indicators 2006 explains "The ratio of public school students to online school computers improved from 12:1 in 1998 to 4:1 in 2003," and " In 2003, 77% of K–12 students lived in a household with a computer and 67% had Internet access at home." This is wonderful and I hope their research is accurate. I also reviewed IES: National Center for Education Statistics which talks about and shows statistics of how educators are using technology in their classrooms (note: Schools that did not have computer/Internet use were not included in the statistics). So I do recognize the most schools have access to the Web and to technology. I just feel it is important to question and acknowledge the realistic situation/possibility of educating in a school that is less fortunate to be able to accommodate to exposing students to such a wonderful (as well as important and prominent) part of our society. It needs to be addressed that there are schools that exist that may/do not have the money/funding.
Regardless, I have thought up some ideas for overcoming this potential problem. For example, if you wish to include technology, such as Web access, in your classroom but your district has limited funding and the Internet is not available in your particular school you could arrange a field trip to a school (in your district of another) that does have Web access OR arrange a trip to a local library that may allow student to use the Internet to do research. This way, students will be receiving the opportunity to use technology for their class in their class, instead of being responsible for using it solely on their own time and trying to find a computer if they do not own one personally.
I hope I have clarified instead of further confused what I was trying to explain.
Tuesday, January 30, 2007
Richardson, Weblogs, and the Classroom
Ok... so what? How do we incorporate the Web and blogging into the classroom, and how do we do it effectively? Theoretically, you can introduce the Weblog in a similar way of introducing a journal or writers notebook; explain to students how they will be keeping a "journal" of anything they choose (or if you have a particular subject, introduce that as well). Only, instead of having pen and paper, students are able to type their ideas on the computer, for everyone-- other students-- to interact with. Students will be able to revise, react with, and respond to their own and others' posts; or introduce the Web on a research level, using student collaboration to create social bookmarking pages that are related to class materials. Or have a class blog to discuss literature (as Richardson did with his students and the Secret Life of Bees), to further class discussion and allow students to elaborate ideas and collaborate together regarding the literature outside of class, requiring student-student interaction over the Web. The interactions between students and teachers with regards to the Weblogs, "give [them] control over [their] own learning" (Richardson YouTube). That's the important thought: having control over learning. Students can feel and understand the responsibility of the work they're being required to do, but will also value the their ability to be creative and have say in what they are doing.
Monday, January 29, 2007
The Sheltered Lives We Lead
This particular episode of 20/20, which focused on the city of Camden, also focused on three students of Camden-- their lives, their education, their struggles. While each student had a different living situation and different struggle, their goals were the same: attend school and become something, anything, to help their family get out of Camden.
Members of the Camden School System explained they can only do so much for students: tutors and volunteers are needed since there is a lack of interest from teachers to work in the area. Furthermore, books and materials are limited.
As I was watching the students strive for a future and wish for something as simple as curtains on their windows, I began to truly realize the inequality that exists in our school systems. As we continue to talk about ways to include technology in the classroom, it occurs to me that some of these students have never even touched a computer, and the schools have trouble enough finding funding for texts. How, if we find ourselves in a school so shunned by the advancements education has seen, can we incorporate technology when we will be struggling to equip our students with books of their own so they can read at home? These student deserve to work on and use a computer as much as the students in their neighboring communities (the ones that have prospered), but what happens when the technology isn't available?
Friday, January 26, 2007
Techonological Standards
With so many standards and expectations already having to be met from so many people, it’s scary to know we have more to meet: New York State and National Standards. You know… the ones we MUST include in our teaching methods to keep our job. The National Council of Teachers of English, or NCTE, determines a set of standards for English teachers to adhere to regarding technology/communication. With every other standard in place, we are now given expectations to include technology in our classrooms. Is this good or bad?
That depends on the teacher. For me, I think the standards are reasonable, and give teachers loose guidelines to follow when they have no idea how/in what way to include technology in their lessons. Technology can be a powerful tool in the classroom. Students who are given the opportunity to use technology in the classroom, during research project/papers, in classroom activities, etc., will be better suited and more comfortable to use it on their own or in the future in the workforce.
Thursday, January 25, 2007
Let's try this again...
ENG 307 has started with... well... blogging. Far from shocking. Here is the first blog (of many) introducing me, Jessica. Hope you enjoy the rest!