Friday, May 18, 2007

Media Literacy Recap

For the Media Literacy Project, Megan and I focused on how relationships are portrayed and constructed through sex and sexuality. We set our lesson up to be part of a larger unit. Each lesson would focus on one aspect of media: news/newspapers, reality TV, music, sitcoms, and commercials/advertisements. The lesson we introduced to the class was on Reality TV.

For the unit, Megan and I created a WebQuest (which is still underproduction). Students would complete analysis tasks for homework that would correspond to the following class day's lesson. The analysis tasks would ask students to view a certain pre-selected aspects of media, then respond to questions in a blog. Their analysis would then help them in lesson projects, as well as the unit's culminating project.

For each class, depending on the media we were focusing on that day, students would work with a technology program to develop a small project (either individually or with a group), using that media and showing how it corresponds/relates/influences their lives. For example, for the lesson on Reality TV, students would be working with iMovie. After reviewing a YouTube clip from homework and discussing it as a class, students would get into groups of three, search for Reality TV related pictures or video clips, and create their own iMovie film. The photos and clips will have to show/explain how they see how relationships in their lives. Groups would then briefly explain why they chose the images they did, and how they think Reality TV may or may not influence their view of relationships based on sex and sexuality.

The mini-projects during the lessons will help students int he unit's culminating project, in which students must use several aspects of media to define, show an understanding, and analyze relationships in their lives as constructed through sex and sexuality. Students will also choose a way to present their projects; the mini-projects during lessons will have allowed students to practice using different programs. After completing the projects, students will present the projects, explaining why they did what they did and integrating important vocabulary learned and used throughout the unit.

Megan and I also created a short iMovie to show with our Media Literacy Project, which is actually out Project Block 4 creation. The movie compared relationships in the media and relationships in "reality."

Monday, May 7, 2007

Just Some Late Night Thoughts...

I actually went back and read one of my first posts today on Camden, NJ. I remember thinking at the beginning of the semester "how can we include the material we are going to learn in this class, in a district like Camden?" I honestly couldn't come up with answers at that point in time. The positive part of Camden, among ever harsh reality their city faces, is that there are many students there who want to learn, want to succeed and better their lives.

A group of us in the AEN program received our student placements for the Fall. I'll be student teaching in Syracuse, which was not a surprise for me since I requested that general vicinity. But realizing that I will be teaching in the inner city at Henninger HS is overwhelming; it doesn't frighten me, but rather makes me apprehensive: I have heard horror stories of Syracuse schools, and I have to remind myself that I need to create my own opinion of them after I participate in the learning environment. But, if these students truly do not want to learn, unlike those in Camden, how do I teach? What do I do? How can I perk their interests? Sometimes there is just more to consider than we can ever know, and we have to have answers to questions that don't even exist yet (someone else said that, I don't remember who. I'm sorry I cannot cite it properly).

Regardless, reality is here. The girls I have spent the past two semesters with will be doing their own thing next semester; no more classes together. The community we built together is changing. Sure, we can keep in contact through emails, blogs, the Colloquium, the phone... but something is different now. The "letting go" is sad, nerve-racking, and exciting. And I know that I will always have, at least, eight other people I can contact and confide in.

Tonight we, those of us going into our Student Teaching, had dinner with a few of our professors: more community. That's what we have been building all along at Cortland. We have the classroom, the study groups, and now, thanks to media literacy and our educators' persistence to integrating blogs, the internet, and the Web in our learning.

Dr. Stearns asked me earlier tonight, at dinner, if I felt I have learned anything in 307. Of course I have. You can't be thrown into material you don't understand and be expected to explain it to others without learning about it yourself. But, besides the programs, I have learned more about myself in 307. Last week we participated in an impromptu "interview" scenario. Everything we had worked on in 307 was put to test-- we just had to choose one aspect and run with it. It was through this that I realized that I have something more to offer, and that I can create lessons not solely focused around a text. I also learned that I have so much else to learn: from my professors, my fellow classmates, and my own students.

In all, part of me wishes this semester wouldn't come to an end, because I know that that's what it could bring to so many areas of my life. On the other hand, it's time to move on, and everything I have learned, studied, produced, and applied from the beginning will now exercised in a school environment-- it's what we, as English Adolescence Education Majors, strive for. Might as well make the best of it and take away from it as much as you can, right?

Wednesday, May 2, 2007

20 minutes... What a Rush

For our class project today I created a WebQuest that will focus on the construction of teenage life in the media.

The Unit will be called "Teenagers: Fact and Fiction." www.freewebs.com/jbrown14580

So far I have created a main page, which briefly explains the unit, the culminating activity, the blog assignments, the resources, and the media. I also began creating the first media page (television shows).

Monday, April 30, 2007

The Media Literacy Award

I found this on YouTube. It's not in English, but the concept is interesting. Apparently "mediamanual.at host annually a competition - the media literacy award® (mla) - for the best and most innovative educational media projects in European schools" (YouTube). Take a look.

Media Literacy and Hobbs

While reading Chapter 8 of Hobb's Reading the Media: Media Literacy in High School English, I felt a lot of what was being said was repetitious. With that in mind though, I did find a few elements of the chapter both interesting and pertinent to my education and future as a teacher:

1. Multiple Forms of Literacy
In this section, Hobb's states that "literacy must be reconceptualized to include these new message forms and to exploit their potential to help students master the demands of reading more sophisticated texts" (131). "These" refers to "visual, electronic, and digital forms of expression and communication" in such literacies such as visual, critical, informational, and digital (131). To continue, Hobbs explains that students use technologies to "create their own messages" (132). This is where it made sense. Students creating their own messages... If students are actively involved in something they like, involving technology they know, they will be more motivated in the work they do.

2. Learning that Connects Literacy to Life
Since media literacy can connect what students learn to what students live, it can increase student motivation and learning. This coincides with what was said above: creating own messages, life relevance, content that connects to students lives. Hobbs confirms that critical think skills, reading comprehension, and writing skills are all impacted (positively) by media literacies.

3. Students' reflection on their Literacy Learning
This is something that we-- students and teachers-in-training-- take part in consistently during the semester. Every course we take is likely to have us reflect on our work, and 3007 alone has us reflect on our work with Media Literacy and Literacy Learning. As students reflect on their work, they can understand what they have learned, how they have learned, the amount they have learned, and what else they can learn. They also begin to understand the material they have learned and why it was presented in such a way. For example: "what critical decisions were made about certain shows/songs/commercials/etc, and what impact does this have on my life?"

Wednesday, April 25, 2007

Second Life

Alright... well... Megan and I decided to create Second Life characters/profiles. Yea... It was more fun than I thought it was going to be and I feel like a huge nerd. But that's OK. I created my profile, and had SUCH A HARD TIME coming up with a name. Every name I wanted was already taken; it was frustrating and disappointing. But, eventually I decided on one-- it's such a stupid name but it's all in good fun: Kiti (as in Kitty... but I couldn't have THAT spelling...) Koba. I wanted Roxie Rossini or Lily Lilliehook, but they were taken, along with every alternate spelling I could think of. Anyway, I created the character, then I fiddled with my character's appearance. It's hard to make it look as much like you as possible, but I tried. I doubt I succeeded. Anyway, Megan and I found each other on Second Life and joked around a bit; she sat on a car while I drove it around. We actually had trouble finding each other at first. The game puts you in orientation worlds and we were put in different worlds; so i had to send you an invitation to the world I was in. Anyway, that was our first adventure as nerds on Second Life :)

Tuesday, April 24, 2007

Block III Media Literacy

Megan and I have been trying to focus out Media Literacy Project even further, but we are realizing that we are having a difficult time doing this. We are setting time aside towards the end of the week to specifically work on this and get a good portion done. Currently, Megan and I want to compare Remakes and Originals of movies/TV shows. For example, Charlie's Angels and The Dukes of Hazzard. We will focus on why the remakes were made, how they are different/why they are different, the violence that was changed and why it would be changed, sex appeal between modern day and the original makes, and why the sex appeal is different, which version the audience seems to prefer and why, etc. So, that is where we are heading.

"Pokinitis"

I went to Will's blog and read through the first one to pop up: Pokinitis. I couldn't help but think "This is what it's about": getting students' interests making them think, peaking their ideas. In fact, I loved this blog entry so much, I had to respond to Will. At the end of his post he wrote "You know what else?' I say. 'You could write it, draw the pictures for it, and then when it’s all done, we could make a movie of it with you reading it so other kids could even listen to it.' Oy, I think. Overload. The curse of being so invested in all of this. But she’s thinking about it." I disagreed that he overloaded her. He was right when he said he got her thinking though. When Tess said "we'll see," she wasn't disregarding the idea. Rather she was thinking about it, figuring out if it could work or if it couldn't. This is the important moment that Will should show his daughter that it can work. He talks about audio books, to which I briefly mentioned Bruce Coville's Full Cast Audio company; showing Tess this could spark her interest in creating he story about Pokinitis further.

It's all about giving students the idea, courage, and belief that they CAN do it. Once you have them thinking about it, you just have to help them follow through by showing them it's possible.

Shape-Shifting Portfolio

After reading Shape-Shifting Portfolios: Millennial Youth, Literacies, and the Game of Life, I had to sit back and consider what was included in my shape-shifting portfolio and how I was building onto it. I kept going back to the definition given at the beginning of the article: a "collection of skills-- for example, educational, social, service, and sports experiences and achievements that can be arranged and rearranged in order to define and redefine oneself as a certain kind of competent person" (114). Well, in that case, I've been building my shape-shifting portfolio all throughout the semester during ENG 307, even if I haven't realized it or felt like I have. For example, in the physicality of the portfolio, I have contributed to groups and collaborated with others to create projects using technology and programs that I have never used before. Metaphorically, I have built onto my by attending events centered on both ENG 307 and the English Department: Scholars' Day, the D.A.T.E. Conference, and presentations such as the one given by Bruce Coville. My physical and metaphorical contributions all add to my portfolio, but I'm still unsure how to showcase the shape-shifting events that can't be shown through "hard-copy."

The article does a wonderful job explaining Katie, Thomas, and Mario's shape-shifting portfolios; how the world around them, their cultures, lives, and literacies all contribute to the portfolios. But how would Mario showcase his culture's influence (and his influence on his culture) in his portfolio? I feel this is where I would help students when they were building their own shape-shifting portfolios. Students need to understand that when representing themselves, they need to show more than hard-copy works. granted, the hard-copy papers, projects, etc. are beneficial and should be shown, but that is not what makes a person who they are. Rather, it is everything in their world that contributes to what they are becoming. So Katie needs to know how to implement her Web use into her portfolio, even if she sees it as her "down-time" from her work; Thomas would include his literacy and literature influences; and Mario would stress his cultural influences.

In other words, the teacher is a guide for students to help students realize what they can put into their shape-shifting portfolios.

Monday, April 23, 2007

Mrs. Megan Bottle

Of all students in our 307 class, Megan would have to be most inspirational to me. She's down-to-earth and never afraid to admit when things are getting tough. It's her realistic take on her work, while still adding an element of humor, that I admire most. Furthermore, she's able to create a stress-free environment. I work with Megan a lot during the week-- we have nearly every class together-- and Megan is always willing to help out when needed. As a team player, Megan also knows the importance of getting help when she's in need of it. To top it off, Megan knows when to separate school life from, well, out-of-school life (part of the de-stressor).

So, in all, I'd have to declare Megan as my inspiration for this semester during 307.

Wednesday, April 18, 2007

EDUTOPIA

I checked out George Lucas' EDUTOPIA site- began searching around to see what section titles seemed most interesting to me, and here's what I came up with:

1. "Amount You Spend Out of Pocket Each Year on Classroom Supplies"
I was very curious in this section because I am more than willing to spend my own money to benefit my students' and classroom needs. At the same time, I'm worried how much I will have to provide because my budget can't. While this site didn't provide a lot of answers, it let me in on a little secret that I didn't know before. Check it out.

2. "Best YouTube Video about Education"
I was glad with this short article. It sums up that you can use sites, such as YouTube, for educational purposes without having to focus on the junk that may be on there as well. In other words: why boycott something useful and educational to students, which they can relate to and enjoy, just because there might somewhere be something not useful on it.

3. "Best Technology Product for Less than $100"
I enjoyed this article for one reason: the flash drive. During my Observation at Newfield High School, I noticed students saving their papers onto CD's so they could bring them into class and work on them. Unfortunately, that wastes a lot of space on the CD AND sometimes the information doesn't save properly or at all. One student in particular couldn't pull up her paper on the school's computer. When I went to help her I realized that she hadn't saved the information to the CD. Now her four page paper, which they were finishing in class and which was due at the end of the day, was sitting at home on her computer. I pulled out my flash drive, showed it to her, and told her she should get one. She mentioned to me that her father had a lot of them lying around, but she didn't know how to use them. So I should her and told her to ask her father for one. This piece of technology is helpful for students to keep their work organized and available.

What I Learned from Jo in Class Today!!!!

Jo aught me how to put stills (photos) into iMovie. We saved some pictures off google of penguins onto the desktop, then imported them into iPhoto, and then imported them into iMovie. The photos end up in a library section on the right side of the iMovie page. All you have to do after that iis drag them into the track and arrange them how you want. You have to connect the photos together, otherwise it will only play one photo. After that, we were going to put in background music using garage band. Instead, Jo wanted to know how to get a ClustrMap on his blog. So I took him through the steps of getting one and now he can see who visits his site!

Monday, April 16, 2007

The MySpace/Hook-Up Generation

I was on my MySpace homepage, doing nothing imporant honestly- because there really isn't anything important one does on there- and I noticed a review for a new-ish book; Unhooked by Laura Sessions Strepp discusses the "MySpace generation" and how "today’s high school and college kids have replaced relationships with 'the casual sexual encounters known as hook-ups'” (MySpace Review).

When I saw the review and visited the page, it discouraged me... a lot. Mostly because random hookups are happening. They happen on our campus, between our friends and classmates; and so many of us have become accustomed to this that we don't think twice about it happening half the time. The MySpace Generation (which, are we a part of?... right now I will classify them as the students we will be teaching) are also taking part in late night parties, hookups, and all the dangers that accompany those.

The MySpace Generation... at first I thought it was odd that Strepp connected the two together. But then I realized the hookups happen online too; teenagers, requesting and accepting friends over MySpace daily, don't always know who they are talking to, though they think they do. They might go to the same school, live in the same town, whatever, and decide to meet and "hookup." I don't know. This is one case where technology isn't always good for being mainstream and needs regulations.

"Video-on-Demand" and the Technorati

With the onset of "Videos-on-Demand" in classrooms, it seems to me that the blogging Technorati tracks will continue to increase in numbers. Videos in classrooms, at least ones accessible right at their fingertips, allow educators to create new lessons and activities for students to participate in; by joining one form of technology with another (especially technology students have some interest in), teachers will gain students' focus and interest. Students can blog about the videos, or, even better, create video blogs in relation to the class videos. Many students already have a familiarity with most of this technology; bringing into the classroom would 1) make school work more relatable to their lives, and 2) make it more interesting and fun.

Sunday, April 15, 2007

Block II and III Projects

Block II
Megan, Jami, and I are almost done with the iPhoto book. I don't think we realized at first what a hassle it was going to be to put it together due to the school's computers deleting everything at night. But now that we were able to use Dr. Stearns Mac, everything should be ready to go early next week. Monday, we will be going over the final touches with Dr. Stearns (ie: making sure pictures are in a "good" order, making sure captions are grammatically correct, free of spelling errors, etc., and anything else that needs "tweeking"). Hopefully the book will look good.

Block III
Megan and I are working on the Media Literacy Project this block. We've thrown around a lot of ideas-- brainstorming at it's finest-- but we think we are going to focus on violence on television. Still, this needs to be narrowed down. We'll be talking with Dr. Stearns sometime this week to talk about possible ideas we have or that she might have on narrowing this subject.

Wednesday, April 11, 2007

Tuesday, April 10, 2007

Bruce Coville

Last Thursday I attended the Bruce Coville presentation Karen had arranged for the Grad student's Adolescent Lit course. Coville discussed Full Cast Audio, his audio book production company based in Syracuse, NY. The presentation and discussion was amazing; Coville is quite the entertainer and speaker. After discussing audio books and the company he asked students to volunteer to participate in an activity; they were instructed to read a skit similarly as those working for in Full Cast Audio would. After reading through the script once, he gave the Grad students advice and had them begin reading it again, interjecting when he had more advice. By the end of this mini-workshop, the performance had evolved and become better. The end of the presentation concluded with Coville handing out Full Cast Audio booklets, a worksheet of how to include audio books in the classroom reciting one of his poems, and audio book short stories, as well as him reciting one of his poems.

In all, the presentation was phenomenal. More undergrads should have attended; you really missed out.

Tuesday, April 3, 2007

Live Chat Transcript: Lagging Behind

In ED WEEKS live chat transcript of “Technology Counts 2007: A Digital Decade,” Susan Victor, a teacher at Holbrook Jr./Sr. High School, asks “What do you think is the biggest roadblock to the successful implementation of technology in schools. It is the digital divide (lack of monetary resources), or is it the digital generation gap (lack of awareness of the value of technology in education by administration), or both?” I found this question intriguing considering we have touched about similar discussions in class. First, we have asked how to integrate technology in classrooms and schools that have low funding. Andrew Trotter acknowledges this situation: “there are a lot of external forces that are reducing the digital divide, as prices drop and families are motivated to sacrifice to buy trendy and/or increasingly useful technologies.” While Trotter makes a good point, he still fails to fully answer the question at hand. Yes, more families are buying computers and technologies that are useful to students. But what about the SCHOOLS that can’t afford this equipment? ED WEEK’s article, “A Digital Decade,” mentioned “E-rates” for discounts, and the fact that 95% of schools are now connected to the internet. But that doesn’t mean their technologies are sufficient enough for student use. That means 95% of schools can connect to the internet; but how many computers do these schools have, how often are students using them, which students are using them, what other technologies does the school offer? I would like to see that part of Victor’s question answered more in-depth. One comment from Trotter I did agree with, that I feel corresponds to this question, though was not directed to this question, stated, “Being a laggard, as opposed to middle-of-the-packer, results in missed opportunities.” I feel many schools are still missing opportunities they can provide to their students by not having the funding or budget for technology they should—digital divide.

ED WEEK

ED WEEK’s article, “A Digital Decade,” discusses the differences in technology between ten years ago and today, explaining “how the terrain has changed—and how it is likely to do so in the future.” The “terrain” has already come a long ways; going from “fewer than two-thirds of U.S. public schools had Internet access, and just 14 percent of those schools had connections on computers located in classrooms” to “around 95 percent” of schools being online, students are gaining more technological knowledge and access through their school day. But what happens when students’ school atmosphere doesn’t meet the home atmosphere several have in terms of technology? Another article in ED WEEK, “Outside Interests,” focuses on just this. Students have more and better access to digital technology in their homes and lives outsides of school than they do in the classroom. The reasons? Budgets and/or educators unsure of how to apply technology to lessons. This is where our class, ENG 307: Technology in the Classroom, comes in. As we—currently students and teachers in training—practice using and learn the functions of several technological applications, we begin to understand how to apply them in our classrooms and lesson plans for the future. “Outside Interests” discusses the use of iPods, video games, pod casts, and blogs within classrooms; we’re already doing this in ours. I couldn’t help read through this article and agree with the schools who are integrating technology, while at the same time questioning those who are having trouble due to unknowledgeable teachers in the area of technology incorporation. Granted, budgets can cause some problems when trying to incorporate technology into schools; but this is addressed “A Digital Age” with the “education rate” (“E-rate”) program, created by the federal government. By offering “telecommunication discounts” and “provid[ing] more aid to disadvantaged school,” the federal government was able to “furnish billions of dollars to help get schools […] up to speed.” If we are spending the money on the actual technology, let’s also spend money on programs for educators that offer knowledge in how to incorporate this technology. That way, students won’t be left at school with inadequate access, limited equipment, or an ancient version of the technology they use at home.

Sunday, April 1, 2007

2020 Vision

Goes with this blog post - http://thefischbowl.blogspot.com/2006/11/2020-vision.html

Tuesday, March 27, 2007

Differences in the Middle: Friedman and Kajder

“Girls, finish your homework—people in China and India are starving for your jobs”: Friedman’s advice to his daughter’s is more than accurate—it’s scary (277). As we move from the world of Web 2.0 to Web 3.0 it is not only our jobs that our becoming at risk, but future jobs as well. To be frank, the middle class is changing. As Friedman states, “In Globalization 3.0, individuals have to think globally to… survive” (276). Honestly, “think[ing] globally” have never been a strong factor of mine unless I was dreaming up a never-going-to-happen trip to Europe; still, my globally is quite different than Friedman’s. So I found myself asking “How can I think globally and get involved in Web 3.0 without actually being thrown into the rampaging fight for jobs across the nations?” My answer led me back to his advice to his children, and caused me to do some homework of my own.

As I was reading Friedman, I honestly felt the middle class was disappearing completely. Luckily (I think) it is merely changing (or so he says). So we change with it. After all, as future teachers we are subject to change; we can’t be expected to stick with one curriculum or lesson plan our entire educational career. Let’s integrate Web 3.0 into the mix. But how? This is where I get stuck. I like to pretend I’m technology savvy. I’m not. Technology spites me. The motherboard on my laptop fried a couple weeks ago and is currently being replaced (thank goodness for warranties). So, if I’m not technology savvy, how can I prepare my students to enter a world where they are competing with people in other nations for jobs, that frankly, the United States (in my opinion) seems to be falling behind in preparing us for? As you can see I have more questions than answers currently, and hopefully I will answer a few… no guarantees.

I’ve created a lot of questions in my mind; the primary ones being “How do we incorporate Web 3.0 into our classrooms” and “How can I prepare my students to enter a world where they are competing with people in other nations for jobs, when I have very limited knowledge of how Web 3.0—and technology— work?” To start, Friedman proposes the idea of “untouchables,” explaining how these “are people whose jobs cannot be outsourced, digitalized, or automated” (278). In other words: become an untouchable no matter what you have to do! Friedman continues to say there are “three broad categories” of untouchables: the “special of specialized,” the “’localized, and ‘anchored,’” and the “old middle” (280). I feel, right now, that as educators we fall into the “old middle” untouchables: we could, theoretically, be replaced; our jobs which were once “nonfungible,” will be taught to students on the Web by the time Web 7.0 rolls around. Regardless, we have to realize that we are currently molding our students into one of these three categories of untouchables (nonfungible jobs) or in a newer category focused around Web 3.0 and a “new middle” class. It’s my opinion that most of them will fall into the “localized/anchored” or the “old middle” category, finding jobs that have to be done in a certain area and require certain know-how, or finding jobs that can eventually move from being nonfungible to fungible. These students will attend the four-year colleges and find their comfort zones. Those that don’t fall into these categories, will surpass even us; they are the “special or specialized” or the “new middle.”

How do we get them on their way? Sara B. Kajder’s article, “Bringing the Outside In: Visual Ways to Engage Reluctant Readers,” can center teachers on ideas of how they can focus their students around a subject. This is exactly what educators need to understand, which in turn, will help us (as teachers) lead our students into the world of Web 3.0.

Kadjer’s article begins with a story of a reluctant student, Trapper, who can’t see, to write in class. Outside of class, Trapper was a powerful writer; he wrote for a cyberzine about Mountain Bikes. As teacher’s we have to bring out-of-class activities to class. This includes writing that students actively partake (and are interested in). Interest oriented. This leads back to Friedman and who we are molding our students into. Learners need to “tap into powerful communication tools to tell their story… powerfully” (Kajder x). In other words, let students do the things we, as educators, ask of them in a way they already know. If we provide them with several interests, especially ones they understand (the Web, iTunes, YouTube… anything that can come from Web 2.0), our students will have a better chance at finding a spot in the Web 3.0 world. This includes the job market.

Furthermore, by having students actively participate in the classrooms, we are creating mock-work situations that could benefit them later in life. Friendman refers to “The New Middlers” in Chapter 6 and what the “help wanted” sign of Web 3.0 looks like. The examples he gives are similar to activities, exercises, and participations classes already use; each “help wanted” sign could apply indirectly to classroom conduct and lessons. For example, the first “help wanted” sign—“Great Collaborators and Orchestrators”—is a great comparison for group work in classroom. Granted the group work we do in classes is less intense than the collaborating Friedman is discussing, but the concept is similar. Students work as a team, and generally one of two will stand out as “leaders” (or orchestrators) within the group. Sure, it is simplistic compared to the idea Friedman puts forth for Web 3.0, but for our students it’s a start.

In closing, Kajder’s article states “Too often we take to heart the saying ‘the medium is the message.’ We cannot let technology be the message. It is there to enhance the message and make it easier to deliver’” (Kajder x). How true. Technology, the medium, is not the message but rather the messenger. Still, while it may not be the message, technology (and Web 3.0) is just as important as the message it helps our students to deliver. Our students need to be able to express their messages with a comfortable messenger, which for most is the Web and technology, a medium they are already comfortable with. With this in mind, as educators we need to provide our students with the opportunity to do express themselves, use technology, and, eventually, enter into the Web 3.0 world.

Tuesday, March 20, 2007

D.A.T.E Conference

Attending the D.A.T.E Conference was quite the experience! I attended four sessions along with the Jennifer Donnelly presentation.

The first session I attended was Shade Gomez’s discussion, “Project Based Learning: Incorporating Technology into the Classroom.” This was phenomenal! Shade began with a short worksheet explaining how PowerPoint should be used in a classroom; it should be used as a backdrop/referral tool rather than the main focus of the lecture or discussion. He then went into different projects his own students had produced using technology. The students’ task was to create their own project; it was freeform. His students had such creativity! Students incorporated music—wrote songs, mixed music on computers, etc—created posters, fabric art, books, and even Lego-mation. The Lego-mation was intense and some students did incredibly well with it. They would take Legos, and use stop-motion animation so the Lego people acted out a scene from Hamlet. They had sets, characters, and voice-overs. I was amazed.

For the second session I attended (and introduced) was Elizabeth Netzband and Tamatha Picolla’s presentation on “Hope IS Here: Finding Positive Messages in YA Literature.” They introduced several great literature options to include in the classroom that give students a positive outlook on life. Still, I feel most stories will have that “upbeat” moral, and those that don’t have a learning experience in them that students can benefit from. While I might take some of their suggestions, I am not sure I agree with their stance completely.

The next event I attended was Jennifer Donnelly’s presentation on A Northern Light. I was impressed by her public speaking and speech writing abilities. Granted she has had practice with this, but Donnelly brought you into what she was saying and allowed the audience to connect with her words and material.

The third session I attended was Carol Mikoda and Jen Rimualdo’s discussion on the use of Nancy Atwell’s reading and writing workshop in the classroom: “No Workshop Left Behind: Reading and Writing at the Middle Level.” Since one of our classes is fairly centered around Atwell, and considering that several students in the class have questioned how it would/if could actually work in a school district, it was wonderful to hear that it is happening in a classroom in New York.

The last session I attended was the informal discussion with Jennifer Donnelly, “Blood, Sweat and Fears: An Informal Discussion of the Writing Life with Jennifer Donnelly." I enjoyed hearing about her techniques, her ideas, and her processes throughout her writing. It was also fascinating to have her on the same level as the rest of us; instead of a famous writer lecturing us on what she does, she was a teacher/student just as we all are.

Sunday, March 4, 2007

And Now for a Little Entertainment.



I might be the only one who finds this funny...

A New Video starring David Pogue

The Video on the Blackberry Pearl

(I wish The Times let me do more than give you the site...)

More on Social Networking

Social Networking's Next Phase - NY Times

So, shortly after posting the last bit I found this. I found it interesting. I hadn't realized how crazy social networking was; I realized it was huge, but this is intense.

When Class Discussion and Reality Coincide

Once again I was looking at The Times online when I came across an article that related too well to our class. "A Cozy Book Club, in a Virtual Reading Room" discusses how social networking has gone from teeny-boppers discussing their latest crush to a broader audience; in this case a literary-based audience. The article even mentions LibraryThing.com, one of the social bookmarking sites my group covered during Project 1, and discusses tagging used within bookmarking sites. The idea is that people are connecting with each other (now more than ever) in subjects they enjoy with help of the Web; this article just happened to highlight much of what we talk about in class!

Sunday, February 25, 2007

When the Virtual World Goes Bad

Virtual Atomic Bombs set off in and destroying the virtual world.

Thursday, February 22, 2007

Oh Microsoft...

Alright, I would have inserted the video itself except the New York Times doesn't give me the code to do that. So I was going to find it on YouTube, but YouTube is "busy pushing out some new concoctions and formulas" (aka the site is under maintenance). So, you will have to work to see this video! Click here! It might take a moment to load, so be patient. I found it funny.

iPod, iPhoto, iTunes, iMovie, iLife, iWeb, and now.. iPhone!

While the name already existed, Apple has secured "iPhone" for their technological advancements. Cisco, who originally coined the name for their "internet-connected phone" in 2000, dropped their lawsuit against Apple, agreeing to allow Apple to use the term "iPhone" for their "much anticipated multimedia device, which combines the features of a mobile phone, an iPod and a BlackBerry" (New York Times). While Apple will begin to use the name, Cisco will continue to apply it to their product as well. In fact, the companies will be working "together 'in the areas of security and consumer and enterprise communication'" (New York Times).

How will we incorporate this in!? :)

Tuesday, February 20, 2007

Media Literacy, Hobbs, and ELA/NCTE Standards

· Media literacy is an expansion of traditional literacy that includes both analysis and production of all mediated forms of communication, from books to Web sites.

AND

· Media literacy helps teachers to more effectively address existing learning standards and engage students with varied learning styles

In Reading the Media, chapter 1, Hobbs discusses situation with students at Concord High School where the teacher and student integrate television shows into the lesson plan; realism vs. fiction. Students have a general idea of television and can assume when a show presents a falsehood in comparison with reality, but when comparing the shows together, the students had disagreement in which presented a more realistic standpoint of life; this opened up the class to discussion and debate (3-4). Hobbs is indicating that by integrating a media form that students were comfortable with into the class room, students are more apt to respond during class with intelligent, synthesized answers, rather than one-word/one-line responses regarding plot/setting/theme/etc. Hobbs states, “Growing up in such a culture, students are hungry for serious dialogue about what they experience via the mass media…. As students engage in sharing ideas and reflecting on experiences that matter to them, a learning environment is created where students can examine the relationships between meaning making, power, pleasure, and identity” (6). In other words, when media is already shaping students’ lives, we shouldn’t ignore it and factor it out completely; rather we need have to allow media to help us in the shaping we are trying to do as well. Furthermore, by allowing media to help us, as teachers, in our lessons we are opening our students up to the standards we want to teach them without forcing the standards on them. Through the lesson mentioned above, students were able to focus on speaking and listening skills without being told to do so; from here the teacher could ask students to write up a reflection on the class discussion for homework (whether its in a writer’s notebook or in blog; if it is a blog, students will then be able to respond further to the debates that had already been started in class).


· Media literacy can and should be integrated across the K-12 curricula at all grade levels and in multiple subject areas.

This seems like an obvious principle to me. Why wouldn’t media literacy be integrated through all levels of schooling? Granted some schools may have a more difficult time with certain stages of technology, but integrating media literacy goes beyond having a computer lab in the school.


Regarding Hobbs research and the first chapters of Reading the Media, there was one thing I found interesting: Concord High School’s mission statement and its emphasis of students’ roles. The mission statement exhorts, “Our community of learners will challenge and expect its members to realize their highest potential. Our community will create a positive learning environment through mutual respect and effective communication” (20). Much of the effort and work is put into the hands of the students and what kind of learners/workers they are. The expectations are high, but adequate and effective. It is the students’ responsibility to help create the learning environment they are entering into. I feel by doing this, more interest can be focused into media literacy; students, in my opinion, will have more awareness and attention to what is going on in the media world, and try to incorporate it into their learning. From that, teachers will be able to incorporate technology and media into the classroom as well, understanding what interests the students have and bringing those to a level that the lessons can begin to thrive from.


ELA/NCTE Learning Standards Emphasizing Media Literacy:


Students apply knowledge of language structure, language conventions (e.g., spelling and punctuation), media techniques, figurative language, and genre to create, critique, and discuss print and non-print texts.


Students use a variety of technological and information resources (e.g., libraries, databases, computer networks, video) to gather and synthesize information and to create and communicate knowledge.


Students participate as knowledgeable, reflective, creative, and critical members of a variety of literacy communities.


Students use spoken, written, and visual language to accomplish their own purposes (e.g., for learning, enjoyment, persuasion, and the exchange of information).

Thursday, February 8, 2007

There is SO Much Going On

Here is another New York Times article. This one is discussing Yahoo Pipes, "a hosted visual-development tool that lets people manipulate data feeds from Web sites to create new applications" (New York Times). Apparently Yahoo Pipes "gives power to" users in developing data feeds. The article even has a comment from the man who coined the term "Web 2.0," so check it out!

And apparently I've become a New York Times fanatic because here is another article from the newspaper. This one discusses YouTube's success. It might be interesting to check out considering the Website has become such a popular part of today's culture and many of us have been including YouTube videos in our blogs.

Hope you enjoy those. Let me know what you think.

And now... to leave you with something intriguing to watch...

Tuesday, February 6, 2007

Warlick, Education, and the Web

"What did education mean then and there?" (Warlick 19).

Warlick begins Chapter 2 in Redefining Literacy for the Century with brief comparison between his grandfather's generations and his with regards to education. He notes, "Education assured that knowledge was learned and remembered. Being educated meant that you held a great deal of information in your memory, and that you gained that knowledge largely through reading, listening, and reciting within a formal and regimented educational setting" (19). I highlighted part of that quotation in hopes that it struck you as it struck me. It occurred to me that while we (as a society) admire those who can recall information in an instance and who retain facts, figures and knowledge easily, there is no longer a dire need to "[hold] a great deal of information in [our] memory"; it is all accessible at our desks or in our laps. All we have to do is turn on our Macs and PC's and we can find any piece of information we choose to know. Rather than memorizing information we are able to interact with it, learn it to a greater level than we may have than by reading and copying books. And why? As Warlick further mentions, students now are able to read "in a third dimension: across, down, and deeper into the information" (22). With the help of technology we can look at a Web site, read the information, and click a highlighted word that takes us to another site with more or related information. It is a quicker way to learn, a more accessible way to knowledge.

Warlick introduces several Web sites (Backflip, PiNet Library) in Chapter 2 and a look into search engine use. Social bookmarking sites and search engines are useful tools for Web users, but rarely are they used effectively, especially the search engines. After starting a search off in a search engine, Warlick suggests using Web directories when finding information on a topic, then referring back to the search engine later on. Internet use is a process: SEARCH ("start Small, Edit search phrase, Advance to large search engine, Refine search phrase, Cycle back and advance again, Harvest the resources"). Students need help learning this process, adapting to it, and using it. By providing technology in the classroom and time to practice Web use for research, educator's can help their students become more proficient and comfortable exploring the Web.

And finally, I just wanted to say I loved this comment made by Warlick: "Once you have your blog, you can publish to your heart's content ad have your ideas, beliefs, and passions available to a global audience" (40). This is exactly what we are doing.

Monday, February 5, 2007

Better Than Google... and We Don't Have It.

It's not a surprise that America isn't the leading nation in technological advancements. It's just a shame. When there is so much out there that can be done on/with computers and the Web, it's sad that we haven't figured more out. But some guy in China has... and he hit big. Pony Ma created Tencent, an "all-in-one packaging of entertainment [...] and a mobile instant-messaging service, “QQ,” has reached more than 100 million users, or nearly 80 percent of the market" (New York Times). And it's grown larger than Google in the two years since it's been created. Amazing. And he's another great piece of information for you: "Another distinguishing feature is the youthful face of China’s online community. In the United States, roughly 70 percent of Internet users are over the age of 30; in China, it is the other way around — 70 percent of users here are under 30, according to the investment bank Morgan Stanley" (New York Times). (Well, I guess in part that's where we come in, incorporating technology into the classrooms and getting students to use the Internet more).

Here's the Wiki for QQ, the messaging service connected to Tencent.

I just found that interesting. Here we are, using Google... everyone uses Google. Right? Well apparently China has found something better.

Saturday, February 3, 2007

I feel I should clarify what I was saying last class...

Toward the end of the class on Wednesday we were discussing technology used in schools across the nation. I believe it was Ashley who brought up the subject of schools in less fortunate communities who might not have access to computers/technology/the Web, to which I brought up the school district in Camden, NJ. I feel that our concerns were not necessarily addressed fully, honestly. That is o.k. What I was trying to explain/ask (and I'm not sure about what Ashley, so understand this is just my opinion), was though I understand several schools across the nation are equipped to help us incorporate technology in the classroom, what happens if we encounter a school district that cannot help us accommodate students with such a wonderful opportunity? It was not my way of making excuses to not use technology, nor was I trying to run away from my responsibilities of incorporating such in my teachings. I was merely bringing up a realistic idea: we could be faced with this.

I will admit that it is less likely. I was researching some websites to find out how many students have computers in their homes and how many schools have access to computer use. Science and Engineering Indicators 2006 explains "The ratio of public school students to online school computers improved from 12:1 in 1998 to 4:1 in 2003," and " In 2003, 77% of K–12 students lived in a household with a computer and 67% had Internet access at home." This is wonderful and I hope their research is accurate. I also reviewed IES: National Center for Education Statistics which talks about and shows statistics of how educators are using technology in their classrooms (note: Schools that did not have computer/Internet use were not included in the statistics). So I do recognize the most schools have access to the Web and to technology. I just feel it is important to question and acknowledge the realistic situation/possibility of educating in a school that is less fortunate to be able to accommodate to exposing students to such a wonderful (as well as important and prominent) part of our society. It needs to be addressed that there are schools that exist that may/do not have the money/funding.

Regardless, I have thought up some ideas for overcoming this potential problem. For example, if you wish to include technology, such as Web access, in your classroom but your district has limited funding and the Internet is not available in your particular school you could arrange a field trip to a school (in your district of another) that does have Web access OR arrange a trip to a local library that may allow student to use the Internet to do research. This way, students will be receiving the opportunity to use technology for their class in their class, instead of being responsible for using it solely on their own time and trying to find a computer if they do not own one personally.

I hope I have clarified instead of further confused what I was trying to explain.

Tuesday, January 30, 2007

Richardson, Weblogs, and the Classroom

As we probe further into computer technology by viewing Will Richardson's videos discussing blogging and including technological advancements in our classrooms, we can further realize the impact technology can have on education. Richardson, cooperating teachers, and participating students discuss the benefits and opportunities with using Weblogs: posts, discussions, mentoring, reactions, homework dependability, parent interaction, resource availability, etc. As educator's are slowly discovering, the Web can be an invaluable resource for them and their students. It allows out-of-the-classroom interaction between teachers and students, students and students, and students and other children their age. Weblogs and the Internet provide an outsourcing agent for students to be active readers, writers, and publishers of their own work, as well are contributors to others' works (Wikipedia, Blogspot), and connect with others through similar interest by way of Social Bookmarking sites (Furl, del.icio.us, Jots). Furthermore, according to a Pew Internet report entitled Social Networking and Teens: An Overview, "More than half (55%) of all online American youths ages 12-17 use online social networking sites." Social networking sites such as Myspace, Facebook, Hi5, and more have taken the teenage and young adult society by storm. This means students are already using the internet, and are presumably enjoying their time using it. In this case, incorporating blogs and social bookmarking into classrooms can provide students with a better understanding of the media they are using, further enhancement in their education, and more enjoyment in the material they are learning and how they are learning it.

Ok... so what? How do we incorporate the Web and blogging into the classroom, and how do we do it effectively? Theoretically, you can introduce the Weblog in a similar way of introducing a journal or writers notebook; explain to students how they will be keeping a "journal" of anything they choose (or if you have a particular subject, introduce that as well). Only, instead of having pen and paper, students are able to type their ideas on the computer, for everyone-- other students-- to interact with. Students will be able to revise, react with, and respond to their own and others' posts; or introduce the Web on a research level, using student collaboration to create social bookmarking pages that are related to class materials. Or have a class blog to discuss literature (as Richardson did with his students and the Secret Life of Bees), to further class discussion and allow students to elaborate ideas and collaborate together regarding the literature outside of class, requiring student-student interaction over the Web. The interactions between students and teachers with regards to the Weblogs, "give [them] control over [their] own learning" (Richardson YouTube). That's the important thought: having control over learning. Students can feel and understand the responsibility of the work they're being required to do, but will also value the their ability to be creative and have say in what they are doing.

Monday, January 29, 2007

The Sheltered Lives We Lead

Friday night, as I was flipping through the channels, I came across 20/20. The show began by mentioning a prospering city in NJ, explaining the wonderful jobs and the greats schools that existed there; overall a good life. Following the short segment on this prospering town, another city was mentioned. This city, not far from the one I just mentioned, is considered the poorest city in the United States, and in 2004 & 2005 was considered the most dangerous city as well. In Camden, NJ the murder rate is seven times the national average. Fifty-eight percent of the children residing in Camden live under the poverty rate. Preschoolers walk to school as citizens are being arrested or as drug deals as being made, and from their bedrooms at night, children an hear gunshots from the streets...

This particular episode of 20/20, which focused on the city of Camden, also focused on three students of Camden-- their lives, their education, their struggles. While each student had a different living situation and different struggle, their goals were the same: attend school and become something, anything, to help their family get out of Camden.

Members of the Camden School System explained they can only do so much for students: tutors and volunteers are needed since there is a lack of interest from teachers to work in the area. Furthermore, books and materials are limited.

As I was watching the students strive for a future and wish for something as simple as curtains on their windows, I began to truly realize the inequality that exists in our school systems. As we continue to talk about ways to include technology in the classroom, it occurs to me that some of these students have never even touched a computer, and the schools have trouble enough finding funding for texts. How, if we find ourselves in a school so shunned by the advancements education has seen, can we incorporate technology when we will be struggling to equip our students with books of their own so they can read at home? These student deserve to work on and use a computer as much as the students in their neighboring communities (the ones that have prospered), but what happens when the technology isn't available?

Friday, January 26, 2007

Techonological Standards

As prospective teachers we are constantly subjected to demands must meet and standards we must adhere to. From our current professors (who truly want to give us the best education we can receive so we are able to prepare our future students as they have prepared us) we were demanded endless hours of hard, though interesting and intriguing, work. From the parents of our future students we are demanded to provide their children with proper schooling, the best classroom atmosphere, further requirements that may seem difficult to accommodate (even though we understand they are only speaking up in the interest of their child(ren)). From our future students we are expected to be role models; give nothing less than our best and provide constant knowledge…

With so many standards and expectations already having to be met from so many people, it’s scary to know we have more to meet: New York State and National Standards. You know… the ones we MUST include in our teaching methods to keep our job. The National Council of Teachers of English, or NCTE, determines a set of standards for English teachers to adhere to regarding technology/communication. With every other standard in place, we are now given expectations to include technology in our classrooms. Is this good or bad?

That depends on the teacher. For me, I think the standards are reasonable, and give teachers loose guidelines to follow when they have no idea how/in what way to include technology in their lessons. Technology can be a powerful tool in the classroom. Students who are given the opportunity to use technology in the classroom, during research project/papers, in classroom activities, etc., will be better suited and more comfortable to use it on their own or in the future in the workforce.

Thursday, January 25, 2007

Let's try this again...

My original blog wouldn't let me sign in again so I had to create another one... here's the post from the first one though. It's not extremely exciting since it was only the introductory blog!

ENG 307 has started with... well... blogging. Far from shocking. Here is the first blog (of many) introducing me, Jessica. Hope you enjoy the rest!